Comments on: Information design: professional vs amateur [part 1]

By: Drew Davies

Drew Davies — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:35:55 +0000

I went back and grabbed some more photos to try and shed some additional light on the matter. I've put them in a new post called Information Design: professional vs amateur (part 2).

By: Craig Hughes

Craig Hughes — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:57:19 +0000

I’m gonna take the shoplifting angle. Does this store have anti-theft sensors at the exit (and perhaps not at the entrance)? My guess is that there is a designed flow of transit through the building to minimize theft and/or Hulkamania nose-smashing. It guarantees that everyone has passed a friendly sales associate, purchased their items, and did not hide a rake on the undercarriage of their cart. If someone exits through the incorrect doors, they clearly have done so through intention. If this sign appeared only since the Holiday season (peak shoplifting times), I’m guessing this might have something to do with it.

Perhaps we’re trying to restrict traffic too much. At -5 degrees outside, I think it’s fair to believe that most people try to park closest to the entrance and take the path of least resistance back to their car. Instead of asking visitors to go the long way around, maybe the best designer would’ve said “Hmmm…we should get another set of anti-theft sensors over here and let the door swing both ways.”

Wal-Mart visitors get to choose which side of the building they enter and exit. Even the exit door itself automatically opens for blind people (and the apathetic).

By: Drew Davies

Drew Davies — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:10:28 +0000

Interesting and enlightening comments. I should note that in this case, it’s somewhat difficult to tell why one shouldn’t exit via these particular doors. Sure, they’re labeled as such (five different ways now), but there’s still no visible reason to any typical, rational person why they shouldn’t be allowed to go back out these doors. You enter through them, so there’s nothing out there that you haven’t already seen. I’m inclined to believe that people in this store are indeed following Justin’s “entitlement/apathy/arrogance” model.

Having thought further about it, I can only figure out one basic reason why the store wouldn’t want you exiting via these doors. The foyer to this store is so poorly designed that the entrance doors are hidden in a little alcove where, if you’re entering, you can’t always see the doors until you’re about to open them. I’m guessing they’ve sometimes had troubles where someone exited via the “wrong” doors, tossed them open Hulkamania-style, and smashed someone’s nose who was trying to enter from the outside.

None of that makes a handwritten note taped over three warnings a better design solution. But I am guessing these doors can’t be alarmed since they are opened all the time by people entering, and may not be allowed to have a one-way turnstile because of fire code. Is there a better solution that exists?

By: Bev

Bev — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:48:36 +0000

First question — what happens if people do exit thru the entry? What’s the worst thing that could happen??? Probably not much at all. Looks like a issue of someone wants to be in charge and you had darn well better do what they say. The best solution would be to watch how the people move about the store, and then design the entry & exits to accommodate…. human nature.

By: stephanie

stephanie — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:15:44 +0000

hi! This winter I’ve seen a lot of homemade signs that seem to contradict the “real” signs around them. A good number have been on or near doors, where ice or snow has led to a temporary detour – going in through the out door for instance. Of course the problem is that once whatever situation is dealt with people are used to ignoring the beautiful and clear signs and keep going the revised route.
I wonder if part of the problem you’ve encountered is that the permanent, clear signs are so permanent that sometimes they become inaccurate. At which point the rest of us learn to question all permanent signs.
Just thoughts. Sorry about the horrid punctuation.

By: Tonya Goth Simmons

Tonya Goth Simmons — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:58:08 +0000

I think this is largely a function of “that sign doesn’t really apply to me” logic. People know they’re not supposed to use the door, but if it’s closer to the car and they’ve got kids in tow (or heavy packages or whatever), it’s just so much EASIER to do what you’re not supposed to.

I agree with Tom. The handwritten sign (while not necessarily indicating store ruffians) does indicate some serious intent, and the “alarm will sound” warning would offer the potential for making the entire store look at you and think you’re a complete idiot who can’t follow a simple direction (stated multiple times).

The design “flaw” if you want to call it that is not offering the proper stick for not following directions.